PDA

View Full Version : Macro shooting - the basics.


Marvin
07-08-2010, 12:45 AM
Lenses designed specifically for macro work can be quite useful but are a bit costly. There are several alternatives and we will look into them here.
But firstly, you will almost certainly need a good tripod and remote shutter release (or use your self-timer).
When you get really close to your subject, the apparent magnification will also magnify any camera movement so it is essential to have the camera supported solidly.

The close proximity to the subject will also give you a very shallow DOF so you will probably want to close down your aperture to help with focusing. Unless you are using a flash you will need a slow shutter so again, the tripod is needed.
Be aware, if using a flash, the lens may be too close to allow a camera-mounted one to light the subject effectively. A pop-up flash will probably leave a lens 'shadow'.

The easiest way to convert your lens for Macro / Closeup use is by adding an extra lens to the front of it. These can be bought quite cheaply and are usually made by Kenco or Fox.
Bought singly or in sets, they are marked in Diopters (just like reading glasses) and are typically made as +1, +2, +4 & +10. These may be your only option if you are using a Bridge or Compact camera.
The disadvantage is that you are introducing an extra bit of glass into the light path and it may not even be a coated lens, let alone colour-corrected. But they can give surprisingly good results.

The next step, for DSLR users, is to move your lens further from the camera body. Notice how your lens gets longer when you focus on a close subject? For macro work you need to place something between the lens and camera body.
Traditionally, we use either bellows or extension tubes. Both do the same job but bellows allow a gradual adjustment from max to min while tubes are in set lengths and you need to add the right length. Get it wrong and you just remove them and start again, simple.
Some Bellows are expensive whilst tubes are dead cheap for a simple set. Even cheap tubes are quite sturdy but less expensive bellows can give rise to some wobbling.

BUT - and it is a BIG but... Tubes and bellows usually disconnect all the 'auto' functions of your lens so if you are not comfortable with manual settings these are probably not for you.
Your lens will also need to be of the type where you can set the aperture when it is not attached to the camera (Nikon 'G' series will close the aperture to minimum when removed).

Macro work will inevitably need manual focusing and the use of tubes or bellows will mean that all the exposure settings will become manual too.

The primary function of a 'normal' lens is to focus a distant subject onto a nearby sensor (or film). Using a 'normal' lens for macro work is working against this rule by focusing a nearby subject onto a more distant sensor.
We are trying to use the lens backwards! Some lenses don't mind this but others object strongly. They show their objections by refusing to focus sharply.
So we need a way around this. The answer arrives in the form of a 'Lens Reversing Ring'. This has your normal body fitting one end and a lens filter thread (male) on the other. If we are to use the lens backwards, lets fit it backwards.
Used in conjunction with the extension tubes (or bellows) this may coax a non-focusing lens to behave itself. Again, some lenses work fine, some don't.
We are trying to use a lens for a purpose which it wasn't designed for. It might work but it won't harm your camera or lens to try it out.

http://www.tog247.com/gallery/data/507/thumbs/diode_macro.jpg (http://www.tog247.com/gallery/showphoto.php?photo=7913)

"Normal" lens, Reversing Ring, Extension tubes.

Pipeman
07-08-2010, 01:55 PM
Nice tut Nigel.

Being a simple guy, I often take close ups and enlarge in PS by cropping.
Although I have a 1:1 macro lens I use any of my lenses, have some goodies with the kit lens.
Tripods - yes but good results can stil be obtained without one, particularly if it is a day without any wind.

Marvin
07-08-2010, 05:48 PM
And a very steady hand like yours Ron. But that takes a lot of practice and a lot of patience.

I am trying to give a few pointers to those who would like to try it, or would like to try HARDER with macro as it is this month's competition subject. We don't want anyone to give up without trying all the possibilities. ;)

benjiblanco
08-08-2010, 07:29 AM
Well written Nigel.

I know the tripod debate could go on for years, so a few facts to add.
Using a tripod will eliminate sooooo many issues, but it brings a few of its own to the table.

Why people don't use tripods...

Too heavy. Awkward to set-up. The god dam **** **** **** insect has flown off by the time i unzipped the tripod bag let alone got it anywhere near.
Its windy and the flower is moving so whats the benefit of having the camera still.
These are great reasons :D

The end of it is, You will get better pictures if you perservere with the tripod. Macro = Patience.

If you really can't use the tripod because patience with the above issues is not making your day fun then consider a few other 'last resort' ways.

Continual High speed shutter. If you are swaying, the flower/insect is swaying or a mixture of both. taking one shot will be pot luck if its in focus. Take 10 shots There is a good chance that the swaying, focus and subject distance will all line up in one of the 10 and produce a nice sharp shot.

Use the self timer set to 2 seconds. When you push the shutter your natural instinct is to move forward. Sounds silly but it is a fact, watch someone take a photo, it happens. To get round that, use the timer. You then have time to push the shutter and move back again before the camera takes the shot.


WHERE'S YOUR HEAD AT???
Try holding a bucket of water out at arms length filled to the brim completely still, no ripples, splashes or drops? impossible.
Your head weighs the same as a bucket of water. If you are leaning forward, your body is struggling to keep your head still, let alone the camera. Keep your head up, over your centre of gravity. Bring the camera towards your head, not your head toward the camera! Yes, that involves moving your feet!!! :D

crasher
08-08-2010, 10:39 AM
Some good points above Nigel.

I invariably use my 1:1 macro lens in manual focus, with the shallow DOF you get when in close, autofocus seem next to useless.

A fold up light reflector comes in handy, as you say, the pop-up flash will not light the subject up close.

If your reflector is a reasonable size and you are lucky enough that the wind is from the right direction the reflector will also help to keep the wind off and the subject steady.

Never tried macro without a tripod - sounds like a very difficult exercise

Marvin
08-08-2010, 10:57 AM
...Never tried macro without a tripod - sounds like a very difficult exercise

I have had some limited success (won some comps with a Bee pic) but Ron is the guy who does these the best. I always have a cheap tripod in the boot just in case, better than nowt, I find.

Like the combined reflector/windshield idea, must give it a go. :top:

Pipeman
08-08-2010, 11:06 AM
Some good tips there.:top:

Fogey
08-08-2010, 11:30 AM
Twine, bean bag, tripod camera mount.

Tie twine to bean bag and tripod camera mount. Attach mount to camera. Drop bean bag onto floor. Stand on bean bag and pull twine tight for a steady hand when taking macros.

crasher
08-08-2010, 12:01 PM
Twine, bean bag, tripod camera mount.

Tie twine to bean bag and tripod camera mount. Attach mount to camera. Drop bean bag onto floor. Stand on bean bag and pull twine tight for a steady hand when taking macros.

What a good idea! I guess a wooden stick would do if you don't have a bean bag handy.

Marvin
08-08-2010, 12:35 PM
Even a Monopod helps a lot. The extra weight and long rod increases the moment of inertia to help steady the camera, even if it isn't resting on the ground.. ;)

bikers
13-08-2010, 07:46 PM
As someone who constantly struggles to get really sharp macros, this is a very helpful thread. Thanks everyone who has contributed.